18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 S
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
10
3
5
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
7.0
2.1
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
88
195
36
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
88%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
85%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
87%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Dry
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
95%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Costs
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store