18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
4
1
33
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
12.0
1.0
4.1
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
88
111
66
658

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
80%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
88%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
77%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store