Segment
1. Continental UltraContact Premium2. Michelin e.Primacy Premium
Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Michelin (80%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the UltraContact and the e.Primacy were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Continental UltraContact has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin e.Primacy has B rating.
| # | Continental UltraContact
| Michelin e.Primacy
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin e.Primacy Very good
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin e.Primacy Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Continental UltraContact Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,6 | |||||
| Michelin e.Primacy Rating: Sufficient | 1,3 | 3,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
