18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
10
13
3
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
6.0
4.3
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
88
109
123
36

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store