18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
1
10
4
Best position
#7
#2
#3
Average position
7.0
6.0
12.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
109
111

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store