18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
10
4
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
6.0
3.3
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
Available sizes
88
109
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store