18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
11
3
1
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
7.0
11.6
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
87
122
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store