18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
14
10
Best position
#7
#2
#2
Average position
7.0
6.3
6.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
Available sizes
88
532
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Tread pattern comparison

Continental UltraContact
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store