18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
4
5
3
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
3.3
2.8
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
40
139
36
Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store