18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
18
3
1
Best position
#7
#1
#2
#1
Average position
7.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
88
47
36
66
Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store