18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
6
1
5
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
4.7
1.0
4.8
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
88
146
66
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store