18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Dunlop
Winter
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
6
2
1
Best position
#7
#3
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
4.7
1.5
1.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
87
146
66
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store