18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
3
14
1
Best position
#7
#2
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
3.7
3.6
1.0
Latest test
2023
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
87
36
194
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store