18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
1
14
4
Best position
#7
#8
#3
Average position
7.0
13.4
12.0
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
153
111

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store