18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Number of tests
1
14
11
Best position
#7
#8
#1
Average position
7.0
13.4
11.6
Latest test
2023
2026
2024
Available sizes
88
153
122

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store