18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Number of tests
1
14
14
Best position
#7
#8
#2
Average position
7.0
13.4
6.3
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
Available sizes
88
153
532

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
86%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store