18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
14
5
3
Best position
#7
#8
#1
#2
Average position
7.0
13.4
2.8
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
153
139
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dry
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Costs
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store