18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
14
1
5
Best position
#7
#8
#1
#1
Average position
7.0
13.4
1.0
4.8
Latest test
2023
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
88
153
66
158

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Costs
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Dry
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store