Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Premium

Continental

UltraContact

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

UltraContact

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

14

4

3

5

Best position

#7

#8

#2

#1

Average position

7.0

13.4

3.3

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

88

153

40

36

63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Continental UltraContact

85%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - cross

Continental UltraContact

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Continental UltraContact

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Costs

Continental UltraContact

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Continental UltraContact

88%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Comfort

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Continental UltraContact

75%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dry

Continental UltraContact

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Continental UltraContact

91%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Firestone Roadhawk

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Browse by brand

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact

Advantage

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison