18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
14
6
3
Best position
#7
#8
#3
#2
Average position
7.0
13.4
4.7
3.7
Latest test
2023
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
88
153
146
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Dry
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Costs
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store