18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
3
5
4
14
3
4
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.3
2.2
3.3
3.6
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
23
63
40
194
36
40

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet side guide
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet circle cornering
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison