18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data

The two tyres that are being compared today are the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Kumho Ecsta HS52, both of which are summer touring tyres.


The Continental PremiumContact 7 is an impressive tyre, consistently ranking first in multiple tests such as Vibilagare, Autobild and ADAC. This is a testament to its quality and credibility in the tyre space. It boasts superior dry braking, wet braking, and wet circle cornering, which makes it a top choice for those in search of a reliable summer tyre. It is made in various European countries including France, Slovakia, Germany, and Czech Republic. It is worth noting that this model replaced the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5. Even with a few weaknesses in aquaplaning behaviour and slightly heavier weight as reported in the ADAC 2024 test, there are no reported weaknesses that outshine its overall performance.


On the other hand, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 has garnered a rating of 81% on our site. According to Autobild and ADAC tests, it shows impressive dry handling and wet braking, alongside a commendable mileage and performance on wet circle cornering. However, unlike the Continental tyre, the model was outperformed in some tests (position 13 in Autoklub ČR) and gained some criticism for its relatively average wet grip and slightly uncomfortable rolling noise. But its overall performance is still strong, especially considering its affordable price tag and predicted high mileage. Its being the successor to the Kumho Ecsta HS51 proves that it was a worthy upgrade.


In conclusion, both tyres are excellent summer options for any vehicle. The Continental PremiumContact 7 held its own and consistently ranked first across several tyre tests. It demonstrates unparalleled performance on both wet and dry roads. The Kumho Ecsta HS52, on the other hand, provides a more budget-friendly alternative that doesn't compromise on quality. While it might not have matched Continental's performance in some tests, it offers exceptional dry handling and braking capabilities and was rated particularly well for its mileage.


To learn more about Continental tyres, click here, and for more on Kumho, click here.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Number of tests
26
10
13
Best position
#1
#2
#2
Average position
2.2
6.0
6.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
66
104
225

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza 6
68%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Wet Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
53%
Vredestein ULTRAC
67%
Wet Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
56%
Vredestein ULTRAC
69%
Wet Circle Cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72%
Vredestein ULTRAC
78%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Continental PremiumContact 7
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
88%
Vredestein ULTRAC
94%
Aquaplaning Cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
62%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Vredestein ULTRAC
98%
Dry Performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
86%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Dry Braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
76%
Dry Handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
93%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Comfort & Noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza 6
82%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Vredestein ULTRAC
74%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Noise Exterior
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
64%
Vredestein ULTRAC
65%
Noise Interior
Continental PremiumContact 7
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
100%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Economy
Continental PremiumContact 7
78%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Vredestein ULTRAC
42%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Rolling Resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
83%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Vredestein ULTRAC
24%

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2024215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison