18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
28
4
4
6
3
1
Best position
#1
#2
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
2.3
3.3
12.0
4.7
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
68
40
111
146
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store