18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
28
4
10
18
5
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.3
3.3
6.0
6.1
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2024
2026
Available sizes
68
40
109
47
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store