18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
28
4
3
14
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.3
3.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
67
40
36
194

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison