18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
28
4
49
3
5
Best position
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
2.3
3.3
3.2
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
67
40
213
36
63

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison