18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
28
18
3
3
4
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Average position
2.3
6.1
3.7
1.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
67
47
36
23
40

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison