18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Dunlop
Winter
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
28
3
4
2
24
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
2.3
3.7
3.3
1.5
2.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
67
36
40
66
302

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Dunlop Winter
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
78%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
88%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dunlop Winter
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
64%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dunlop Winter
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
97%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison