18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 7
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
28
14
4
3
5
Best position
#1
#8
#2
#2
#1
Average position
2.3
13.4
3.3
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
67
153
40
36
63

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison