18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Michelin Primacy 4 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Continental grips harder in the wet; Michelin lasts longer and costs less to run.

The Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Michelin Primacy 4 are both established premium summer tyres that have since been updated — the Continental by the Continental PremiumContact 7 and the Michelin by the Michelin Primacy 4+ — yet both remain widely available and are still worth serious consideration where priced competitively. Across eleven direct comparisons, the Continental leads seven wins to four, and the pattern that emerges is consistent: the PremiumContact 6 is the more dynamic, grip-focused tyre, while the Michelin Primacy 4 is the longer-lasting, more economical choice built around Michelin's philosophy of safety that endures over the full life of the tyre.

Continental PremiumContact 6
Good for
Drivers prioritising wet-weather safety and grip Spirited drivers wanting sharp, planted handling Mixed-use driving including faster roads Performance and executive saloon owners
Not ideal for
Economy-focused drivers watching fuel consumption Those prioritising tyre longevity above all else Buyers wanting the lowest possible cabin noise
Michelin Primacy 4
Good for
High-mileage drivers wanting exceptional tread life EV owners prioritising low rolling resistance and range Comfort-first family car drivers valuing a quiet ride Budget-conscious buyers seeking long-term running costs
Not ideal for
Drivers needing maximum wet-road and aquaplaning confidence Spirited drivers wanting a dynamic, involving feel Those frequently driving on faster roads in wet conditions

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Michelin
Primacy 4
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
36
20
14
3
Best position
#1
#1
#8
#2
Average position
3.1
3.5
13.4
3.7
Latest test
2023
2022
2026
2025
Available sizes
303
386
153
36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Michelin Primacy 4
59%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Primacy 4
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Michelin Primacy 4
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Wet performance is where the Continental PremiumContact 6 builds its clearest advantage. In the same Autobild braking test, it stopped from 100 km/h in 29.6 metres on wet tarmac against 30.4 metres for the Primacy 4 — and this advantage is corroborated across the broader test portfolio, where the Continental's wet handling scores are consistently higher. Aquaplaning is a particular differentiator: the PremiumContact 6 carries a meaningfully stronger aquaplaning score, and real-world owners frequently cite wet-weather confidence as its standout quality. The Primacy 4 is not unsafe in the wet — Michelin's EverGrip technology is specifically designed to maintain water evacuation as the tread wears, which is a genuine long-term safety benefit — but it has been flagged in multiple programmes for average aquaplaning reserves and minor wet-grip limitations compared to the sharpest tyres in its class. On a wet motorway or in standing water, the Continental gives a more reassuring margin.

Dry
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Michelin Primacy 4
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Michelin Primacy 4
90%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%

Both tyres are capable on dry roads, with dry braking figures that are essentially equal in the largest shared test — the PremiumContact 6 stopping in 36.5 metres against the Primacy 4's 35.8 metres in Autobild's 53-tyre comparison, a difference that is marginal in practice. The more meaningful distinction is in handling character: the Continental is consistently described as confident, planted, and precise, with sharp lane-change responses and generous dry reserves. The Michelin delivers composed, well-balanced dry behaviour and earned top dry-road marks from ADAC, but it is not the sportier tyre — some reviewers note it can feel initially less crisp than rivals, though it settles in well after the first thousand kilometres or so. For drivers who want a more involving, responsive feel on a clear road, the Continental has the edge.

Comfort
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%

The Michelin Primacy 4 is the more refined tyre to live with day to day. Its noise score is notably better than the Continental's, and across 156 verified owner ratings, low cabin noise is the most consistently praised attribute — far ahead of the frequency with which Continental owners mention quietness. Tread life is the Michelin's clearest practical advantage: its mileage credentials are exceptional, and ADAC awarded it top marks for wear in 2021 — owners on Volkswagen Golfs and Peugeot 3008s routinely highlight long, predictable tread life. Rolling resistance is also significantly lower than the Continental's, translating to better fuel economy over a full replacement cycle. The PremiumContact 6, by contrast, has attracted some criticism for fuel consumption and below-average rolling resistance in efficiency tests, and a handful of owners have noted lower-than-expected mileage.

Offroad
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%
Michelin Primacy 4
78%
Grass traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
71%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
Gravel traction
Continental PremiumContact 6
65%
Michelin Primacy 4
82%
Costs
Confidence
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Michelin Primacy 4
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Michelin Primacy 4
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Michelin Primacy 4
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Michelin Primacy 4
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Verdict

These two tyres suit genuinely different priorities, and both are now available at reduced prices as end-of-line stock. If active driving confidence — particularly in wet conditions, on faster roads, or where aquaplaning is a real concern — is your priority, the Continental PremiumContact 6 is the more capable and dynamically satisfying choice, backed by seven wins from eleven head-to-head tests. If you cover high mileage, want to minimise fuel costs, and value a quieter, more refined ride over outright peak grip, the Michelin Primacy 4 will serve you better over the long run. Both have been superseded, so availability in specific sizes varies — but where both are on the shelf at similar prices, most drivers will find the Continental the more rounded performer, while high-mileage users have a strong case for the Michelin.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store