18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Firestone Roadhawk


In this comparison, we will take a closer look at two popular summer tyres - the Continental PremiumContact 6 and the Firestone Roadhawk. We will review their performance based on different tests and give you a verdict on their strengths and weaknesses.


Continental PremiumContact 6


The Continental PremiumContact 6 is a top-quality summer tyre designed for touring. It is manufactured in Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic. This award-winning tyre replaced the Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, offering improved performance and better fuel efficiency. The PremiumContact 6 has been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


In terms of test results, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has demonstrated impressive performance, earning high ratings on both wet and dry surfaces. In the ADAC and Autozeitung tests, the tyre scored particularly well in wet braking, wet handling, wet circle cornering, and dry steering response. The PremiumContact 6 holds an overall rating of 90% on our website.


Strengths of the Continental PremiumContact 6 include its excellent performance on wet surfaces and high level of driving safety. However, it does have weaknesses in terms of efficiency and fuel consumption.


Firestone Roadhawk


The Firestone Roadhawk is a summer tyre designed for various types of vehicles. Manufactured by Firestone, a reputable brand in the tyre industry, the Roadhawk aims to provide good performance on both wet and dry surfaces.


Test results for the Firestone Roadhawk are mixed. In the ADAC 2020 and Autozeitung tests, the tyre received praise for its performance on dry surfaces, particularly in dry steering response and handling. However, it scored poorly in wet conditions, with particular weaknesses in wet braking and handling. The Roadhawk holds an overall rating of 71% on our website.


Strengths of the Firestone Roadhawk include its handling on dry surfaces and low fuel consumption. However, the tyre has significant weaknesses when it comes to performance on wet surfaces, as well as increased wear and tear.


Comparison Verdict


Based on test results and overall performance, the Continental PremiumContact 6 is a better choice when it comes to wet surface performance and driving safety, while the Firestone Roadhawk may be more suitable for drivers prioritizing dry surface handling and fuel efficiency. Ultimately, the Continental PremiumContact 6 demonstrates a more balanced and reliable performance across various driving conditions, making it the preferable choice for most drivers.

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 6
Firestone
Roadhawk
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
36
21
3
3
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
3.1
11.9
3.7
4.7
Latest test
2023
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
296
164
34
126

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Michelin Primacy 5
79%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Dry driving behavior
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 6
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry steering response
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry performance
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%

Offroad

Offroad
Continental PremiumContact 6
76%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Mileage
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Price/value
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison