18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
4
18
4
6
1
Best position
#5
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
Average position
6.0
12.0
6.1
3.3
4.7
1.0
Latest test
2021
2025
2024
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
74
111
47
40
146
66

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Continental PremiumContact 5
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison