18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental PremiumContact 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Continental
PremiumContact 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
2
18
1
3
4
5
Best position
#5
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Average position
6.0
6.1
1.0
3.7
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2021
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
74
47
66
36
40
63

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 5
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
55%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental PremiumContact 5
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Continental PremiumContact 5
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Continental PremiumContact 5
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Continental PremiumContact 5
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 5
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Costs
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Continental PremiumContact 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store