18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
14
4
1
4
14
Best position
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
3.8
12.0
1.0
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
37
111
66
40
700

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry lane changing
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%
Dry steering response
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
84%
Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store