18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Continental
ContiPremiumContact 5
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
6
3
4
5
4
Best position
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.8
4.7
3.7
3.3
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
37
146
36
40
63
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Dry
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry driving behavior
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry handling
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry braking
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Costs
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Mileage
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Fuel efficiency
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Rolling resistance
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Comfort
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Interior noise
Continental ContiPremiumContact 5
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store