18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Ceat SportDrive SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Ceat
SportDrive SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
5
4
Best position
#11
#1
#2
Average position
11.0
2.8
3.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
13
139
40

Offroad

Offroad
Ceat SportDrive SUV
70%

Wet

Wet
Ceat SportDrive SUV
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Wet braking
Ceat SportDrive SUV
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet handling
Ceat SportDrive SUV
51%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Ceat SportDrive SUV
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Comfort
Ceat SportDrive SUV
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Exterior noise
Ceat SportDrive SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Dry

Dry
Ceat SportDrive SUV
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Ceat SportDrive SUV
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Ceat SportDrive SUV
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%

Costs

Costs
Ceat SportDrive SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Ceat SportDrive SUV
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison