Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Premium

Bridgestone

Potenza S001

R15 – R20

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 4 S

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Potenza S001

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

Number of tests

5

18

1

Best position

#3

#1

Average position

7.0

6.1

1.0

Latest test

2020

2024

2025

Available sizes

185

47

66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Confidence

Bridgestone Potenza S001

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Bridgestone Potenza S001

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Bridgestone Potenza S001

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Bridgestone Potenza S001

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Bridgestone Potenza S001

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Bridgestone Potenza S001

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Dry

Confidence

Bridgestone Potenza S001

82%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

Bridgestone Potenza S001

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Dry handling

Bridgestone Potenza S001

94%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Comfort

Confidence

Bridgestone Potenza S001

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Bridgestone Potenza S001

60%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Confidence

Bridgestone Potenza S001

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

Bridgestone Potenza S001

57%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Mileage

Bridgestone Potenza S001

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin e.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Potenza S001

Efficient Grip Performance 2

ION Evo

ION Evo

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison