18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 (2026)

5 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Sava (62%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 62% of the Sava Eskimo HP2. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 56% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Number of tests
49
15
Best position
#1
#6
Average position
3.2
15.5
Latest test
2024
2025
Available sizes
244
29

Performance comparison

Averaged from 5 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Sava Eskimo HP2
66%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
91%
Sava Eskimo HP2
59%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Sava Eskimo HP2
57%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
70%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
92%
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Snow Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Sava Eskimo HP2
81%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
68%
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Snow Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Ice Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
86%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Ice Braking Abs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
84%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Sava Eskimo HP2
87%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
77%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Sava Eskimo HP2
64%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
71%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
75%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Economy
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Sava Eskimo HP2
82%
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Sava Eskimo HP2
89%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
67%
Sava Eskimo HP2
75%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2020205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Winter
2022215/60 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2019225/45 R17View
ADACADAC
Winter
2021225/50 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.