Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Radar Dimax Alpine
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Radar). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Radar (31%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 53% of the Radar Dimax Alpine. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Radar Dimax Alpine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 235/35 R19 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Dimax Alpine were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where Blizzak LM-005 is made - Italy/Hungary/Poland.
| # | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Radar Dimax Alpine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Radar Dimax Alpine 25.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Radar Dimax Alpine Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 36,8 | 30,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 38,1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,1 | 28,1 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 37,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 30,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Radar Dimax Alpine | 40,5 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
