12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Hankook (83%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

85%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

Snow braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 56%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Interior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 63%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Price/value

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	1-	2	1-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	33,4	28,2
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	14,6	15,8	22
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,3	294,4	297,6	96,2	79,6	98,1
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,4	3,2	2,0	1,9
Show test details