18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Hankook
ION FlexClimate
Falken
e.Ziex
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
49
1
3
2
5
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.2
1.0
3.7
2.0
2.2
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
213
27
36
48
63

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
76%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
90%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
71%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
67%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
90%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
74%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Hankook ION FlexClimate
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison