14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from Japan. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Falken (58%). The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the Blizzak LM-005 and the EuroWinter HS01 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A wet grip rating, whereas 75% of Falken EuroWinter HS01 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland and EuroWinter HS01 is made in Turkey.

#	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /82%	Falken EuroWinter HS01 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R22	R13 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 49x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.2

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

71%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

Snow traction

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Snow handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Lateral guidance on snow

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 60%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 78%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Dry steering response

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 70%

Dry lane changing

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 65%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

91%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 94%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

78%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Comfort

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 82%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

71%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

69%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 51%

Mileage

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 60%

Price/value

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 54%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Ice braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 81%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 18 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,8	26,3
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,3	25,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2+	2	3+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2-	2-	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 245/40 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	2+	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2	2	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2022 215/60 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Rolling resistance	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	2,0	1,8	1,4	1,8	1,5	2,7	1,5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	2,0	1,8	2,7	2,4	2,1	3,4	2,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	3,5	2,0	2,2	2,5	2,7	2,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2022 245/45 R19

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,3	9,4	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,4	7,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Sufficient	8,3	8,2	4,3	4	6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	2+	2+	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1-	2	1	2	2+
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	3+	3+	2
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2021 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear
Best values in test	1,6	1,9	1,9	2,0	2,6	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory	1,7	2,5	2,8	2,3	3,3	3,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,3	2,4	2,4	2,9	3,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Falken EuroWinter HS01	36,2	29,5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2021 195/55 R16

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	8,7	9,6	9,3	10	10	10
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,7	9,6	8,6	8,2	8	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	7,1	7,4	7,0	7,5	4	10
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Falken EuroWinter HS01	98	286,4	281,7	98,9	82,6	99,7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2	1-
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
Show test details

ACE Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Points total	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	200	67	48	60	18	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended	200	64	47	60	17	7
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	167	63	45	39	10	5
Show test details

AutoMotorSport Winter tyre test 2020 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	9,5	8,7	9,9	10	9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	9,5	8,5	9,2	10	8
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	7,1	6,9	6,7	5	8
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	30,3	24,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	30,3	24,5
Falken EuroWinter HS01	37	27
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory	2,3	2,9	2,7	2,4	3,0	2,0	2,4
Show test details