18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

LM-005 leads in wet braking; Blizzak 6 dominates on snow with better all-round balance.

Within Bridgestone's winter tyre range, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 and the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 occupy different positions despite sharing the same Blizzak name and premium standing. The LM-005, launched in 2020, was built around a single obsession: wet-weather dominance. It earned multiple test wins that year and established itself as one of the strongest wet-braking winter tyres the segment had seen. The Blizzak 6 is its direct successor — a newer, broader-thinking tyre that trades some of that wet supremacy for superior snow capability, better mileage, and a more balanced overall character. Choosing between them is really a question of which winter conditions you encounter most.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Good for
Drivers in wet, rainy climates with little snow Motorway users prioritising aquaplaning safety Owners of smaller cars needing 14–15 inch sizes Those wanting a proven run-flat winter option
Not ideal for
Drivers who need sharp snow cornering ability Those prioritising maximum dry braking performance
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Good for
Drivers facing genuine snow and icy roads regularly Those wanting the most complete all-winter balance High-mileage drivers wanting longer tread life Modern car owners on 16–22 inch fitments
Not ideal for
Drivers in primarily wet climates needing best wet braking Cars requiring 14–15 inch winter fitments Budget-conscious buyers — premium pricing applies

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
49
14
4
17
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.2
3.6
3.3
1.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
213
194
40
80

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Snow
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Snow traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Snow cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Lateral guidance on snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%
Snow acceleration
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
94%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97%
Snow performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry lane changing
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Dry steering response
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry driving behavior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Dry performance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
Interior noise
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Price/value
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Ice
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ice braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
23%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%

Tread pattern comparison

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Verdict

If you live in a climate where rain, standing water, and sudden wet-weather stops are your dominant winter concern — particularly on motorways or in milder winters with little snow — the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 remains one of the most capable wet-braking winter tyres available, with a proven track record across years of independent testing and a size range that covers almost every passenger car. For drivers who regularly face genuine snow — compacted, icy side roads, mountain approaches, or heavy snowfall regions — and want a more complete winter tyre that balances snow confidence with competitive wet and dry behaviour plus better mileage, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 is the more rounded choice and reflects where the Blizzak range has evolved. Most buyers replacing an LM-005 today will find the Blizzak 6 the natural step forward; those whose winters are primarily wet rather than snowy may prefer to stay with the LM-005's still-unmatched wet-braking pedigree.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store