18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO vs. Continental WinterContact TS 860 (2026)

3 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). But when it comes to comparing Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO and Continental WinterContact TS 860, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Continental WinterContact TS 860 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2018 205/55 R16 test, where both the Blizzak LM-001 EVO and the WinterContact TS 860 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (99%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 860 also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Number of tests
4
23
Best position
#6
#1
Average position
9.8
2.3
Latest test
2018
2021
Available sizes
10
78

Performance comparison

Averaged from 3 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
83%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Wet Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
95%
Wet Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
95%
Wet Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
83%
Aquaplaning Cross
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Dry Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
83%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Dry Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Dry Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
86%
Dry Lane Change
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
80%
Dry Steering Reaction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Snow Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
65%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
88%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Snow Braking
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Snow Traction
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Snow Handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
85%
Snow Circle Cornering
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
50%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
89%
Ice Performance
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
81%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Ice Braking Abs
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
83%
Ice Lateral Guidance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
78%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
77%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
87%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Noise Exterior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
86%
Noise Interior
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
78%
Ride Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
96%
Economy
Confidence
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
86%
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001 EVO
Continental WinterContact TS 860
84%
Continental
WinterContact TS 860
Rolling Resistance
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
82%
Fuel Efficiency
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
92%
Mileage
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 EVO
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 860
79%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2018195/65 R15View
ADACADAC
Winter
2018205/55 R16View
AutoMotorSportAutoMotorSport
Winter
2018205/55 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.