18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-Grip SUV
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
4
6
3
5
Best position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#1
Average position
12.0
12.0
4.7
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2017
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
6
111
146
36
63

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
56%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
43%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison