18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-Grip SUV
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
5
15
Best position
#12
#1
#2
Average position
12.0
2.8
9.0
Latest test
2017
2026
2025
Available sizes
6
139
226

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
43%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
86%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-Grip SUV
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison