Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Dunlop Winter
Also compare with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 dominates wet conditions; BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 wins on snow and comfort.
The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 represent two very different philosophies in winter tyre design. The BFGoodrich, backed by Michelin Group engineering, has built a reputation as a snow specialist with impressive traction on white roads and a remarkably quiet ride. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005, on the other hand, is a premium wet-weather weapon — one of the strongest performers in wet braking across independent tests. Both are winter tyres, but they excel in very different conditions, making this comparison a tale of two climates.
These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterWet performance is where the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 truly dominates. Across four independent comparative tests, the Blizzak LM-005 averaged 28.2 metres in wet braking, compared to 30.6 metres for the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 — a gap of 2.4 metres that translates to a meaningful safety margin in real-world emergency stops. Bridgestone's wet grip score of 90.2 and wet braking sub-score of 94.6 place the Blizzak LM-005 among the top performers in its segment on wet surfaces. Aquaplaning resistance is solid on both tyres, though the BFGoodrich holds its own better than its braking distances might suggest. Overall, for drivers in wet winter climates, the Blizzak LM-005 is the clear choice.
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2On dry roads, neither tyre is particularly distinguished, but the gap between them is meaningful. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 offers better dry braking and more confident handling at the limit, consistent with its premium positioning and sporty character. The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 trails here, with longer stopping distances in dry conditions noted across multiple tests. For drivers in mixed-climate regions where dry spells are common even in winter, the Blizzak LM-005's dry competence is a real advantage.
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 reclaims ground on snow — its strongest domain. Across three independent snow braking tests, the G-Force Winter 2 averaged 27.5 metres, edging the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 at 28.4 metres. With a snow score of 93.2, the BFGoodrich is genuinely elite on snow-covered roads, offering strong traction and confidence in the conditions many winter tyre buyers worry about most. The Blizzak LM-005's snow handling has been flagged as a relative weakness in several test reports, and this data confirms the pattern. Drivers who regularly encounter snowfall will find the G-Force Winter 2 the more capable companion.
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005The BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 stands out as the quieter, more refined tyre of the two. Tyre noise is notably low for the segment, making it a good option for drivers who spend long hours on motorways and value a calm cabin. Ride comfort is also well-rated, with the tyre absorbing road imperfections competently. The Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is no harsh rider, but it prioritises grip over refinement and is somewhat noisier by comparison. If ride quality matters to you, the BFGoodrich has the edge here.
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Pirelli P Zero Winter 2Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Dunlop WinterBFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005In head-to-head testing across 17 shared evaluations, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 wins 14 times, the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 just 3. That record largely reflects the Blizzak's dominance on wet and dry surfaces, where the majority of winter driving takes place in Western and Central Europe. But the BFGoodrich punches back on snow — the condition that most winter tyre buyers actually fear — and offers a quieter, more comfortable ride.
The choice comes down to your climate. If you live where winters mean rain and slush more than snow, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 is the stronger, safer all-round winter tyre. If your winters are genuinely snowy and you want a relaxed, quiet ride alongside excellent snow traction, the BFGoodrich G-Force Winter 2 is a seriously underrated option — especially given its Michelin Group engineering heritage. Note also that the Blizzak LM-005 has been succeeded by the Blizzak 6, so availability and pricing of the LM-005 may vary.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
VS
VSVSVSVSVSVSVS
VSVS
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs Uniroyal WinterExpert
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs Kleber KRISALP HP3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs Kumho WinterCraft WP52+BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870 PBridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Semperit Speed-Grip 5
TheTyreLab.com
Free — on the App Store
Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.
