18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nexen N Fera Primus

The BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nexen N Fera Primus are two tyres that have been tested extensively across various platforms. Both are designated as summer tyres, making them suitable for dry and wet conditions. However, the similarities don't extend far into actual performance.


The BFGoodrich Advantage, manufactured by BFGoodrich, is known for its excellent dry handling, quiet rolling noise, low rolling resistance, and competitive pricing. Its strengths lie broadly in comfort and stability on dry terrain, which is a significant advantage for speed enthusiasts and everyday users alike. Despite these plus points, it falls short in wet conditions, with notable understeer, which affects its overall rating, leaving it with an overall score of 68%.


On the other hand, the Nexen N Fera Primus, a product of Nexen, stands tall with a superior rating of 71%. Its high acquaplaning quality, secure wet handling, short wet braking distances, and wallet-friendly price point make it an appealing choice. The tyre's standout feature is its ability to perform admirably in both dry and particularly in wet conditions, a factor that had it ranking high in test results. However, it too has limitations. It tends to understeer in dry conditions and has a significantly restricted lifespan allied with a high rolling resistance.


In mutual test comparisons, the Nexen N Fera Primus consistently outperforms the BFGoodrich Advantage. For example, in the Autobild tests, the Nexen Tyre claimed the 10th position out of 50, while the BFGoodrich tyre trailed behind at 20th among 51 tyres tested. Similar results were observed in the ADAC tests, with Nexen securing the 10th position compared to BFGoodrich's 21st position.


In conclusion, while both tyres have their strengths and weaknesses, the Nexen N Fera Primus edges past the BFGoodrich Advantage due to its superior wet handling and aquaplaning qualities. However, if ultimate comfort in dry conditions and noise reduction tops your considerations, the BFGoodrich Advantage might be a better choice.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Nexen
N Fera Primus
Number of tests
14
6
Best position
#8
#10
Average position
13.4
12.7
Latest test
2026
2024
Available sizes
153
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
67%
Nexen N Fera Primus
81%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Nexen N Fera Primus
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
75%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Nexen N Fera Primus
73%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Nexen N Fera Primus
62%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
75%
Nexen N Fera Primus
74%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
60%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
65%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Nexen N Fera Primus
70%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Nexen N Fera Primus
59%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
60%
Nexen N Fera Primus
50%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2024205/55 R16View
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison