18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
10
4
18
3
5
Best position
#8
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
6.0
12.0
6.1
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
109
111
47
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store