18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
14
10
18
4
3
5
Best position
#8
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
13.4
6.0
6.1
12.0
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
153
109
47
111
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Wet side guide
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Dry
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Comfort
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Costs
Confidence
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Price/value
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store